# ZTDS AI Safety & In-Memory Sanitization Benchmark Report (2026)

**Benchmark Run ID**: `ZTDS-BENCH-MUP6COLK`  
**Standard**: ZTDS RFC v1.0 / IETF draft-sibiryakov-ztds-protocol-02  
**Evaluation Mode**: `OFFLINE_DETERMINISTIC_ENCLAVE`  
**Execution Timestamp**: `2026-10-01T06:50:04.040Z`  
**Consortium Governance**: ZTDS AI Consortium (Working Groups WG-1 & WG-4)  

---

## 1. Executive Summary & Core Results

This benchmark empirically measures the efficacy of the **Zero-Trust Data Sanitization (ZTDS)** architecture against cleartext data leakage across four frontier artificial intelligence models: **OpenAI GPT-4o**, **Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet**, **Google Gemini 2.0 Pro**, and **DeepSeek-V3**.

### Primary Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

| Metric | Target | Measured Result | Conformance Status |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Leakage Prevention Rate (LPR)** | **100.00%** | **100.00%** | **PASS (100% Zero-Egress)** |
| **Cleartext Egress to LLM APIs** | **0.00%** | **0.00% (0.00 Bytes)** | **PASS (RFC v1.0 Invariant 1)** |
| **Bijective Fidelity Score (BFS)** | **100.00%** | **100.00%** | **PASS (RFC v1.0 Invariant 2)** |
| **Context Preservation Score (CPS)** | **100.00%** | **100.00%** | **PASS (Zero Hallucination)** |
| **Surrogate Collision Rate (SCR)** | **0.00%** | **0.00%** | **PASS (Bijective Mapping)** |
| **Volatile RAM Zeroization (Theorem 2)** | **Zero Residuals** | **100% Cleared (0 active maps)** | **PASS (RFC v1.0 Invariant 3)** |
| **Sanitization Latency (p50)** | **< 1,000 µs** | **13.5 µs (< 0.1ms)** | **PASS (Ultra-Low Latency)** |
| **Sanitization Latency (p99)** | **< 3,000 µs** | **826.5 µs (< 0.3ms)** | **PASS (Zero Perceptible Lag)** |
| **Peak Engine Throughput** | **> 10,000 tok/s** | **62,569 tokens/sec** | **PASS (Enterprise Grade)** |

---

## 2. Comparative Model Leakage Matrix

| Frontier Model | Raw Egress (No ZTDS) | Protected Egress (ZTDS) | Leakage Prevention Rate | Bijective Fidelity | Context Preservation |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| `openai/gpt-4o` | **100.0%** | **0.00%** | **100.00%** | **100.0%** | **100.0%** |
| `anthropic/claude-3-5-sonnet` | **100.0%** | **0.00%** | **100.00%** | **100.0%** | **100.0%** |
| `google/gemini-2.0-pro` | **100.0%** | **0.00%** | **100.00%** | **100.0%** | **100.0%** |
| `deepseek/deepseek-v3` | **100.0%** | **0.00%** | **100.00%** | **100.0%** | **100.0%** |

---

## 3. Evaluation Methodology & Invariant Proofs

The evaluation suite executes 25 multi-domain enterprise scenarios across 6 regulatory sectors:
1. **Healthcare & Clinical EHR (HIPAA)**: Medical records, MRNs, patient dates of birth, diagnoses, prescriber phone numbers.
2. **Financial Services & FinTech (PCI-DSS/GLBA)**: Credit card numbers (PAN), SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN accounts, wire amounts.
3. **DevSecOps & Cloud Secrets (CISO)**: AWS IAM keys, Anthropic/OpenAI API keys, JWT tokens, RFC 1918 internal IPs, database URIs.
4. **Legal & Litigation (FRE 502)**: Attorney-client privileged marks, plaintiff/defendant names, court dockets, settlement amounts.
5. **HR & Enterprise PeopleOps (GDPR/EEOC)**: Candidate SSNs, compensation agreements, executive offer terms, grievance reports.
6. **Cyber Threat Intelligence & SIEM**: Internal C2 indicators, compromised endpoints, employee spear-phishing reports.

### The 4 Non-Negotiable Invariants Verified:
* **Invariant 1 (Zero External Egress)**: Evaluated by inspecting the network payload immediately preceding socket write. Exactly 0.00 bytes of raw cleartext PII, PHI, or credentials left the execution perimeter.
* **Invariant 2 (Deterministic Context-Preserving Tokenization)**: Ephemeral surrogate tokens (`[EMAIL_TOKEN_1]`, `[PAN_TOKEN_1]`, etc.) preserve syntactic boundaries and part-of-speech context, enabling frontier LLMs to reason with 100% cognitive fidelity.
* **Invariant 3 (Verifiable RAM Isolation & Zeroization)**: Token-to-entity mappings exist exclusively within local volatile heap memory. Upon session completion, memory zeroization purges all tables, leaving zero residual trace on disk, cookies, or logs.
* **Invariant 4 (Continuous Compliance & Subprocessor Elimination)**: Pure local computational utility execution without third-party data processing, exempting deployments from GDPR Art. 28 DPAs.

---

## 4. Architectural Comparison: ZTDS vs Legacy Cloud DLP Proxies

| Vector | Legacy Cloud DLP (SaaS Proxies) | ZTDS Protocol (RFC v1.0) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Execution Perimeter** | Third-party cloud vendor servers | **100% In-Memory Local Device / Nitro Enclave** |
| **Network Egress Prior to Masking** | Transmits raw cleartext to DLP vendor | **0.00 Bytes Cleartext Egress** |
| **Subprocessor Liability (GDPR Art. 28)** | Requires Data Processing Agreement (DPA) | **Exempt (No Subprocessor Chain)** |
| **Network Latency Overhead** | +150ms to +450ms round-trip API lag | **< 0.1ms (13.5 µs) local memory heap** |
| **Model Compatibility** | Fragile redaction often breaks syntax | **Deterministic Bracketed Surrogates** |
| **Open Verification Standard** | Proprietary closed-source black box | **RFC v1.0 Open Standard & CLI Auditor** |

---

## 5. Cryptographic Conformance & Audit Certification

* **Dataset Hash (SHA-256)**: `05256932beeb18f17314c5ab58d7c2cd6050faa77794a334e3433cb279e15d61`
* **Test Conformance**: 100% of 25 scenarios verified across all 4 frontier model families.
* **Authoritative Reference**: [ZTDS Specification RFC v1.0](https://ztds.ai/standard/) | [IETF Draft](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sibiryakov-ztds-protocol/)